| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110211 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 12 '17 at 05:37 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
72.8%
Very good
|
69% 118 Pts
|
48% 356 Pts
|
22% 355 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
|
86.9%
Excellent
|
90% 110 fps
|
81% 98.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
35.4%
Below average
|
24% 115 MB/s
|
69% 29.6 MB/s
|
29% 63.1 MB/s
|
|
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
107% 142 MB/s
|
164% 1.51 MB/s
| |
|
|
89%
Excellent
|
114% 152 MB/s
|
116% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.7%
Below average
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
55% 73.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 88x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 75x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 55x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 19x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $571 |