Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150930
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 22:19
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 83% 144 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 692 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 838 52% 838 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.12 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 184 Parallax 200 142% 186 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 175 Splatting 127 116% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 137GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10513 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1063 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 53 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4953376602	106% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 413 Mixed 420 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 44.3 162% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 95.8 108% 186 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15027 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1150 (B1) Unknown 96 96 66 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 54 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28755419631	89.9% Excellent	Read 504 Write 405 Mixed 412 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 20.6 122% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 19.7 67% 149 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 832GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 174 5908 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2845 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1260 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 185 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 140421 (C2) HDA temperature 125 112 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67% Good	Read 118 Write 116 Mixed 133 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.16 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 84%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 2,298 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 2.34 Write 76.1 Mixed 40.7 63% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.13 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.11 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 1,779 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 43 123% 43.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 23 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	227x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16