HP 810-290nz

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP 810-290nz (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140912
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 21:21
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 81.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 591 66% 520 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% HP(103C 6516) ≥ 4GB CLim: 841 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.7% Below average	Lighting 46.7 Reflection 49.2 Parallax 62.7 38% 52.9 fps	MRender 47.2 Gravity 43.2 Splatting 62.3 43% 50.9 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100 4,989 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 5056 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1618 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 450986049537 (AE) Unknown 100 100 34 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 394 (BE) vendor-specific 62 48 38 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	64.3% Good	Read 388 Write 278 Mixed 294 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 14.3 94% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 23.2 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 13.9 38% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3GB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 100 101 (03) Spinup time 117 100 51580109419 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7325 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 100 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13306 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4086 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 93 4703073407012 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 405209119 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7333 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7333 (C2) HDA temperature 193 136 188979085343 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0		Read 105 Write 108 76% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 69%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 199 8983 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3707 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3896 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1572 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 30 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 38895 (C2) HDA temperature 118 111 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72% Very good	Read 138 Write 113 Mixed 116 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.19 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 16.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-290nz Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: HP 810-290nz

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	7x

GPU
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
X110 256GBSanDisk $100Bench 79%, 4,989 samples	4x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	3x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 1,052 samples	1x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 60%, 1,419 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $634

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16