Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote TM85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM85
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100913
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 07:35
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 58.9 1-Core 62.5 2-Core 98.2 45% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 150 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420M 1,922 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 036D) 1GB CLim: 500 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	2.66% Terrible	Lighting 3.33 Reflection 3.46 Parallax 2.16 3% 2.98 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 3.13 Splatting 2.22 2% 3.26 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.66% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 8450170 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 104926051057592 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3954 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 440 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 851 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8450170 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8450170 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8450170 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15379 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12661 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12661 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14803	32.7% Below average	Read 182 Write 105 Mixed 120 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 8.74 49% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 4.85 31% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 61%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 513GB free Firmware: 0706 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 26.4 Mixed 29.4 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.31 88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	20x
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
S280 1TBKingdianBench 85%, 769 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	6x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 28%, 1,570 samples	4x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16