Acer Aspire M7811

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M7811 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M7811
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100429
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '17 at 22:11
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 128 62% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 178 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Good	Lighting 75.5 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 74.1 62% 74.1 fps	MRender 69.4 Gravity 69 Splatting 70.4 57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76 9,139 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 10558 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 672 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1490634543066 (A6) Unknown 100 100 65 (A7) Unknown 100 100 14 (A8) Unknown 100 100 122 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 89 (AE) Unknown 100 100 107 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 46 197569740837 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 6623130030416 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 10298 (EA) Unknown 100 100 21394 (F1) Unknown 253 253 13059 (F2) Unknown 253 253 14466 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	36.2% Below average	Read 227 Write 57 Mixed 34.9 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 8.15 63% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 87.8 DQ Mixed 20.5 44% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 952GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 11 (03) Spinup time 239 162 3008 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6427 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 38352 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2735 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 435 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 52 52 445594 (C2) HDA temperature 121 99 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 90.5 Mixed 50.8 60% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.18 74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 830GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 119 108 7033 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20386 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 39184 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2927 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 497 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 59 59 424347 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60% Good	Read 113 Write 96.3 Mixed 11.9 53% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.19 69% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba 9905402-413.A00LF 9905402-413.A00LF Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.9% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 13.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10.1 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M7811 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M7811

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	29x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	22x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	8x
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 4x2GBToshibaBench 34%, 148 samples	15x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	8x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16