PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 790 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 790 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20111230 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 10 '17 at 12:40 |
Run Duration | 251 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.89
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
102%
Outstanding
|
||||
43.3%
Average
|
||||
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.02%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
27.3%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 2,196x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 1,323x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 566x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,229x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 449x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 394x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |