PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20131003 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 10 '17 at 12:33 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.5%
Above average
|
||||
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
4GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
38.3%
Below average
|
||||
56.1%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 143x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 28x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 25x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $490 |