Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '17 at 04:03
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 268
95% 169 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 775
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.9% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 108
Parallax 96
82% 102 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 82.9
72% 88.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 502
Mixed 510
115% 513 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 49.7
186% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 164
174% 288 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
978GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 150
Mixed 157
123% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.14
58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 181
Mixed 163
137% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.24
94% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
439GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 124
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.24
71% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 28.3
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 29.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback