Lenovo 200748U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 200748U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 200748U
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '17 at 21:47
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$57
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 45
31% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 45.3
8-Core 42.7
6% 44 Pts
64-Core 45.7
3% 45.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
Legend(17AA 2005) 64MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.383.1.1000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33% Below average
Read 132
Write 111
Mixed 119
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 12.4
57% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 80.9
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 31.7
39% 69 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 33%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback