Asrock H110M-HDS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '17 at 03:38
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 719
65% 545 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 60GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0111A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 358
Write 82.8
Mixed 136
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 2.33
53% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 2.4
15% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
697GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 155
Mixed 139
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.33
123% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback