Multicom U230

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Multicom U230 (all builds)
Motherboard	AMI Aptio CRB
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '17 at 16:38
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	30% Poor	Memory 40.8 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 69 31% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 129 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 1.09 2% 1.69 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 240GB SSD 240GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 9 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 21 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	58.2% Above average	Read 466 Write 402 Mixed 437 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 2.23 50% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 42.4 DQ Mixed 2.28 9% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 61%
Toshiba 032G94 31GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 29GB free Firmware: 0.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 47% Great: 49%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 32GB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 24GB free, PID 16a5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 139 Write 34.7 Mixed 34.9 68% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.26 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.72 72% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16