PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 LE (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110211 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '17 at 18:12 |
Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.9%
Average
|
||||
33%
Below average
|
||||
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
129GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 308x |
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 230x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 213x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 72x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $639 |