Asrock B75M R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B75M R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131220
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '17 at 08:24
Run Duration	443 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 452 46% 375 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 112 Parallax 106 90% 109 fps	MRender 94.1 Gravity 98.5 Splatting 98.1 80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190 3,375 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 369 Write 254 Mixed 256 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 9.53 62% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 41.9 71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 103%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 599GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 28.7 Mixed 7.62 27% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.18 62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 167%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB 1,201 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID null Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 3.51 Mixed 4.06 8% 8.13 MB/s	4K Read 2.92 4K Write 0.08 4K Mixed 0.17 19% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 14.1 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.1 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M R2.0 Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M R2.0 - $80

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	50x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	38x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	23x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	11x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
DCLT8GN128S 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 227 samples	5x
99P5471-067.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 47%, 38 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $429

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16