HP Compaq tc4400 (EY544ES#ABE)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq tc4400 (EY544ES#ABE)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30B1
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060728
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '17 at 20:03
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M 420
U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Memory 30.8
1-Core 14.2
2-Core 14
15% 19.7 Pts
4-Core 14.3
8-Core 13.3
2% 13.8 Pts
64-Core 14.2
1% 14.2 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541060G9SA00 60GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MB3OC60P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 20.4
Write 20.3
Mixed 4.89
11% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.18
41% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.25% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.1 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback