Packard Godzilla 1.5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard Godzilla 1.5  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard Godzilla 1.5
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '17 at 17:34
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9000-$121
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 56.6
35% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 91.9
13% 96.4 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTS
Device(1631 0188) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 320.49
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 0.97
2% 2.98 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.48
3% 3.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC4OC72E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 89.4
Write 81.4
Mixed 52.3
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.29
60% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback