Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140409
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '17 at 23:51
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 61 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 99.1 44% 70.8 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 182 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 8516) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 15 Parallax 20.9 15% 17.9 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 18.1 18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX2 240GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 100 50112161 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -73856257614337 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2113 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 48 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 112 100 50112161 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15552 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8896 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8896 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14976	24% Poor	Read 145 Write 57 Mixed 82 21% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 4.53 39% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 99.5 DQ Write 63.6 DQ Mixed 21 32% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 52%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 127 127 21494235434 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1121 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5787 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1002 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1121 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 171799740450 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 166 Mixed 162 130% 172 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.17 76% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%
LaCie P9220 1TB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 786GB free, PID 106d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 87.6 Write 101 Mixed 71.5 112% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.29 78% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 4,460 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16