Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro Super Server (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X11SAE
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170524
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '17 at 09:28
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 2,254 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 212 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 610 61% 496 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 377.48 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 52.3 31% 43.4 fps	MRender 46.8 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 27.9 30% 38.4 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 461GB free Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,761 Write 1,360 Mixed 1,269 325% 1,463 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 62.4 226% 85 MB/s	DQ Read 536 DQ Write 502 DQ Mixed 196 236% 412 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 235%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9283 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 449 (B1) Unknown 97 97 47 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17370945897	102% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 397 Mixed 415 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 41.4 141% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 102 130% 235 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127 6,562 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 231GB free Firmware: 1U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2924 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 14582 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 12279 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3946 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 237 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 49262 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 236224118811 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8284 (DE) Loaded hours 95 95 2088 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 292 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	37.8% Below average	Read 59.4 Write 72.2 Mixed 63.3 49% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.23 72% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 47%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 210GB free Firmware: HPM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 92 239660981 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 12143 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 41290510 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22196 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3289 (B7) Unknown 100 253 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 84 84 16 (BC) Unknown 100 98 12885098500 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 36 1387896700961 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 111 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 232436 (C2) HDA temperature 33 64 51539607585 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 55 239660981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	43.9% Average	Read 76.8 Write 76.2 Mixed 70.5 56% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.39 89% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 51%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 19GB free Firmware: HPM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 209298449 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10743 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 21777988630 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20894 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 3033 (B7) Unknown 100 253 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032848 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 27 1813098528803 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 28 28 145357 (C2) HDA temperature 35 73 55834574883 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 51 49 209298449 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	34.1% Below average	Read 53.3 Write 65.8 Mixed 48 42% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.05 4K Write 0.53 4K Mixed 0.16 30% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 23.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 21.8 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	25x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	20x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	20x
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	18x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	13x

RAM
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	12x
18ADF2G72AZ-2G3B1 2x16GBMicronBench 76%, 43 samples	10x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GBMicronBench 92%, 577 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $603

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16