Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '17 at 07:26
Run Duration347 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 686
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.49 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
39GB free
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 71.1
Mixed 64.7
49% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.82
4K Mixed 0.55
104% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 118
Write 85.1
Mixed 95.6
75% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 6TB
3TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 172
Write 171
Mixed 162
217% 169 MB/s
4K Read 4.29
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.26
103% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 83%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
270GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 69.2
Write 62.7
Mixed 36.2
68% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.19
55% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
37GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26% Poor
Read 59
Write 60.4
Mixed 45.7
70% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.19
54% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
24GB free, PID a00b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 63
Write 56.4
Mixed 59.6
76% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.18
53% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB
17GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 122
Write 39.7
Mixed 38.1
69% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.79
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.97
101% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 32%
Great: 30%
WD USB Elements Device 500GB
10GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 38.7
Mixed 16.3
38% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.18
55% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback