| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5K-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1680x1050x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20071031 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 03 '17 at 05:29 |
| Run Duration | 103 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.8%
Average
|
41% 60.2 Pts
|
9% 68.8 Pts
|
4% 69.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
EVGA(3842 1145) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52
|
7.02%
Terrible
|
8% 7.38 fps
|
6% 7.06 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59.1%
Above average
|
77% 103 MB/s
|
96% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
|
20.5%
Poor
|
18% 6.33 GB/s
|
17% 5.8 GB/s
|
46% 87.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 55x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 10x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $180 |