Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160923
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '17 at 19:10
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 146 56% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 162 19% 146 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E198) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 7.31 Parallax 6.59 6% 7.13 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 5.96 5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 136 136 12896239781 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 668 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3048 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 448 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 668 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 668 (C2) HDA temperature 133 133 257699414061 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	98.2% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 185 Mixed 164 127% 169 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.15 56% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-014.A00G 2x4GB 1,428 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.3% Above average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	314x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	179x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	144x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	123x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	108x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	46x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	29x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBHyperX $299Bench 79%, 20,912 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	25x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 30% - Below average

Total price: $542

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16