Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '17 at 11:40
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 115 2-Core 229 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 572 59% 473 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 21.6 15% 23.7 fps	MRender 29.1 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 33.7 22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2998 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2412 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 36 (AE) Unknown 100 100 62 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 54 197569347623 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 24159962607 (F7) Unknown 100 100 757880378 (F8) Unknown 100 100 420149849	83.9% Excellent	Read 508 Write 474 Mixed 458 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 15.4 95% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 14.8 51% 109 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 107%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 14GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -4956391353422 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2964 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2945 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 102 102 4909983 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2945 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 112224 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 47 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 112224 (F2) Unknown 100 100 101070 (F9) Unknown 100 100 4680	62.7% Good	Read 492 Write 146 Mixed 235 63% 291 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 13 88% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 12.7 60% 137 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 905GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 115 113 7241 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 72 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 72 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 38 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1413 (C2) HDA temperature 110 92 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.2% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 102 Mixed 91.6 73% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.33 96% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 57%
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 159GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 135 131 4233 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11246 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 41885 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3647 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 179 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11246 (C2) HDA temperature 106 95 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.3% Average	Read 73.6 Write 83.9 Mixed 50.2 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.38 98% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 46%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135 3,861 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 81GB free Firmware: STDOA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 119 (03) Spinup time 121 121 25792676189 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5947 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 38603 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3619 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6052 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6052 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 214749347880 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	39.7% Below average	Read 71.4 Write 66.7 Mixed 61.8 50% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.33 93% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 20,667 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	60.7% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 18.4 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 21 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 53.7 74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LE PLUS Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS - $412

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	184x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	137x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	107x

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	13x
Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 62%, 5,533 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16