HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111102
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '17 at 11:35
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 164 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 296 36% 277 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.27% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 6.03 6% 7.28 fps	MRender 9.52 Gravity 7.83 Splatting 8.26 7% 8.54 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.27% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 5 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2165 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 247 (64) Unknown 100 100 2751648 (65) Unknown 100 100 302784 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 11 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 95 95 1622 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 699 (B7) Unknown 98 98 14 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 100 158914445344 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 5 (E7) Temperature 95 95 5 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5008 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1561 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3804 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3112 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 5	33.3% Below average	Read 243 Write 124 Mixed 124 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 7.92 43% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 17.6 DQ Mixed 7.34 24% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 82%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 264GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 88 720910 (02) Throughput performance 137 100 91 (03) Spinup time 133 100 25786712374 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2559 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 458759 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13013 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2358 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 91 91 655359 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 92 21760484 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 388169762 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2559 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2559 (C2) HDA temperature 176 146 176094314530 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 7 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.6% Good	Read 106 Write 119 Mixed 76 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.32 77% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F 42GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.1% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 10 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	487x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16