Intel DQ35JO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	INTEL_ DQ3510J_
Motherboard	Intel DQ35JO (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101209
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '17 at 22:19
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 63 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 76.8 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 74.6 43% 63 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 140 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.54 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 4.17 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 3.31 3% 4.15 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.47 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 20413195 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -131967165131100 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 807 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 69 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 37 43 81607196709 (C2) HDA temperature 37 43 81607196709 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 20413195 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 20413195 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 20413195 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 34359738369 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6567 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2791 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2791 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6663 (F4) Unknown 99 99 3145767	49% Average	Read 230 Write 123 Mixed 130 35% 161 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 18.2 91% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 29.1 48% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 310GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 157 152 5141 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 535 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1961 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 336 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 62 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 336 (C2) HDA temperature 111 101 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15783 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.9% Average	Read 88.1 Write 78.5 Mixed 73.8 60% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.4 117% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 37GB free Firmware: JPFOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 124 124 140 (03) Spinup time 120 120 12897353919 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6688 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 21219 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5367 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6693 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6693 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 219044315174 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15953	28.3% Poor	Read 54 Write 44.6 Mixed 27.5 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.26 63% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.4 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DQ35JO Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DQ35JO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x
GTX 650 Ti BoostNvidia $140Bench 17%, 15,701 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16