HP p6-2272ef

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6-2272ef (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 2ADA
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '17 at 19:16
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 42 2-Core 118 50% 80 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 311 34% 268 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1B0A 90B7) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.67 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 2 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 902GB free Firmware: 9300 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 86.8 Write 106 Mixed 102 74% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 3.15 4K Mixed 0.26 110% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA5R0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 65539 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 92 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896829622 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1984 (05) Reallocated sector count 1 1 1996 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10823 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1959 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4873 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4873 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 176094773285 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 2796 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	64.3% Good	Read 107 Write 118 Mixed 103 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 0.09 4K Mixed 0.08 15% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 99%
takeMS USB Colorline 2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 2093 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.89% Terrible	Read 27.6 Write 4.28 Mixed 7.33 12% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.92 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 31% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.89% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 9 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6-2272ef

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)