Intel DH67CL

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	INTEL_ DH67CL__
Motherboard	Intel DH67CL (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121204
Uptime	21.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '17 at 17:43
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 91 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 165 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 264 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.6.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.3% Poor	Lighting 29 Reflection 26.3 Parallax 37 24% 30.8 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 27.3 Splatting 29 23% 27.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11657199 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -103525891688946 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1900 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 72 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 78 81609490465 (C2) HDA temperature 33 78 81609490465 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11657199 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11657199 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11657199 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 26634 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9555 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9555 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7077	44.5% Average	Read 465 Write 108 Mixed 161 53% 245 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 2.08 58% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 7.75 28% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 512GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 186 5575 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4595 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13692 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1897 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 30 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 336603 (C2) HDA temperature 117 111 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.6% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 91.8 Mixed 103 72% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.21 86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 67%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 58GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 185 758 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5771 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23758 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3738 (BE) vendor-specific 56 40 44 (C2) HDA temperature 106 90 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	25.9% Poor	Read 45.4 Write 44.4 Mixed 44.4 34% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.37 93% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB 7,477 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 13.7 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DH67CL Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH67CL - $96

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	13x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	7x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	10x
HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 8,807 samples	7x
Radeon HD 8570AMDBench 6%, 3,522 samples	7x

SSD
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	11x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
KP223C-ELD Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 99U5471-054.A00LF Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 16GBKingstonBench 37%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBCorsairBench 31%, 11,204 samples	2x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8GBHynixBench 44%, 42 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16