Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '17 at 22:30
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 844
82% 676 Pts
64-Core 1066
66% 1066 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 206
Parallax 188
150% 193 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 181
Splatting 129
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
883GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 999
Write 964
Mixed 984
220% 983 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 27.7
138% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 108
67% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 142%
Great: 445%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
405GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2,172
Write 1,423
Mixed 1,438
371% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 28.9
107% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 101
111% 187 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 217%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 514
Write 414
Mixed 417
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 22.1
100% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 14
48% 106 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
915GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 80.6
Mixed 82.7
65% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.32
100% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 174
Write 159
Mixed 125
191% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.24
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 105%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
54GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 112
Write 10.9
Mixed 18.1
40% 47 MB/s
4K Read 5.18
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
21% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 19.7
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 12.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback