Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Memory 32.5 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 46.9 21% 34.2 Pts	4-Core 92 8-Core 92.5 12% 92.2 Pts	64-Core 93.3 6% 93.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3803) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.1.1000 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 1.06 1% 1.64 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 264 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 140 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 54 50 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1568800869	76.6% Very good	Read 476 Write 357 Mixed 397 91% 410 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 28.3 102% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 80 DQ Mixed 42.6 46% 78 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 269GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 90.8 Write 82.2 Mixed 21.2 75% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.19 55% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 8GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.99% Terrible	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 240 17% 240 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 9.99% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 27%, 4,598 samples	6x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	5x
RMT3170EF68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,466 samples	5x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16