Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 30 '17 at 01:13
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 771
78% 632 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 65.5
50% 65.2 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 59
Splatting 54.4
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
102GB free
Firmware: 0020LVM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 65
Write 60.6
Mixed 62.7
47% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.35
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 43%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
112GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 59.2
Mixed 58.7
46% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.15
43% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36%
Great: 59%
WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 200GB
29GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 53.8
Write 53.3
Mixed 49
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.33
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 34%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
17GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 43.8
Write 47.4
Mixed 45.5
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.16
61% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback