Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '17 at 21:52
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 295
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 803
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 149
Parallax 143
122% 147 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 136
Splatting 109
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 413
Mixed 424
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 52.5
190% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 118
146% 261 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Nvme WDC WDS512G1X0C- 512GB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,285
Write 252
Mixed 539
150% 692 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 21
132% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 44
152% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 127%
Great: 153%
FCCT480M500SSD1 480GB
198GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 421
Mixed 448
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 30.6
140% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 58.7
116% 234 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 99%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
172GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 408
Mixed 437
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 26.8
138% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 77
124% 237 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
330GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 75.3
Write 73.3
Mixed 62.1
53% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.37
86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
120GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 78
Write 68.4
Mixed 80.3
57% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.23
69% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $992
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback