Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '17 at 23:35
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1185
105% 892 Pts
64-Core 1,670
103% 1,670 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
EVGA(3842 3791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 46% Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,216
Write 1,402
Mixed 1,558
382% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 48.5
224% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,160
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 218
303% 581 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 275%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
84GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 519
Write 414
Mixed 256
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 12.1
118% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 111
118% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2TB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 116
Write 139
Mixed 114
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 5.18
4K Mixed 0.73
207% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 94%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6
1GB free, PID 1642
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 16
Write 4.6
Mixed 6.61
10% 9.08 MB/s
4K Read 4.77
4K Write 0.16
4K Mixed 0.17
29% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 31.4
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 11.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $905
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback