Asus P5QL-E

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5QL-E (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090911
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '17 at 18:22
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5450-$195 10,801 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 43 2-Core 86.2 41% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 166 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85C7) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 31.7 27% 30.2 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 31.9 Splatting 32.8 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2439 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1092 (B1) Unknown 98 98 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 55 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 729 (EB) Unknown 99 99 89 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8368327372	57.2% Above average	Read 261 Write 209 Mixed 177 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 22.5 98% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 51.3 53% 87 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 115%
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 104GB free Firmware: 3.AAH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 84 230567173 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15374 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 59 60634279733 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 20098 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 9194 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 47 638844966 (C2) HDA temperature 38 53 64424509478 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 61 55 100718252 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 4294967295 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 4294967295 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 182 5569 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	31.3% Below average	Read 55.8 Write 53.3 Mixed 51.6 40% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 36%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50 4,831 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 19GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 328 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 93 91 2420 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2975 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3861 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 95 95 5813 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2646 (BF) G-sense error rate 76 76 242786 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 43 244813856795 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 1 1 153866 (DF) Load/unload retry count 95 95 5813 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 66849	46.4% Average	Read 80.2 Write 81.3 Mixed 56 54% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.39 96% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 47%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 11GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 135 6133 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7733 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20582 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7395 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 334 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7733 (C2) HDA temperature 113 96 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15603 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.8% Average	Read 92.2 Write 77.6 Mixed 77.3 62% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.37 100% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	19x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	17x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
SSDPR-CX400-128-G2 128GBBench 70%, 718 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	72x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	31x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16