Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '17 at 16:19
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 235
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 767
76% 618 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 60.3
51% 63.3 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 54.5
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 413
Mixed 418
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 36.8
125% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 106
118% 205 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 124%
WD WD2002FFSX-68PF8N0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 159
Write 104
Mixed 122
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.54
139% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 114%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
249GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 84.9
Write 89.7
Mixed 87.8
66% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
166GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 95.8
Write 90.1
Mixed 62.4
103% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 40.6
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback