Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170613
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '17 at 18:06
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 80.5 1-Core 148 2-Core 266 90% 165 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 1,181 104% 885 Pts	64-Core 2,037 126% 2,037 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1644 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 124 Parallax 112 98% 119 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 111 Splatting 91 82% 101 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,853 Write 1,182 Mixed 1,253 316% 1,429 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 32.9 135% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 740 DQ Write 474 DQ Mixed 160 240% 458 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 236%
Adata S510 120GB 690 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 49GB free Firmware: 3.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 2552311 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 116281944587058 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2656 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 104 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 48 47247786011 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2552311 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2552311 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2552311 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13293 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12015 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12015 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23122	44.5% Average	Read 199 Write 118 Mixed 134 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 14.2 82% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 30.1 47% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 79%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 293GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 7 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 82 81 5519 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7127 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13738 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3289 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 50 214749151260 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 94 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7225	67.9% Good	Read 116 Write 120 Mixed 118 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.45 124% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 77%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 204GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 86 (03) Spinup time 138 138 38683410824 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5539 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15955 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4141 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5605 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5605 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 227634118689 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.7% Above average	Read 106 Write 102 Mixed 97.8 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.41 107% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 61%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 157GB free Firmware: AX001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2584 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 6033 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 6936 (0A) Spinup retry count 220 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2160 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 139 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 28017 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044118557 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1544 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 269 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	49.2% Average	Read 85.1 Write 86.1 Mixed 79.5 63% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.19 73% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 17.4 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	495x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $130Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $793

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16