Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '17 at 15:43
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 89.5 1-Core 120 2-Core 242 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 924 83% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2216 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Lighting 83.9 Reflection 83.2 Parallax 72.8 68% 80 fps	MRender 78.7 Gravity 75.9 Splatting 78.4 64% 77.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11267 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4955 (B1) Unknown 96 96 81 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 48 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 581 (F1) Unknown 99 99 34261728903
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC9F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 72 85454146 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 17340 (05) Reallocated sector count 93 93 9552 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 70446051 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22662 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 87 87 13939 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 54556 (BC) Unknown 100 76 21475754033 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 571867167 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 794 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 204641 (C2) HDA temperature 31 47 68719476767 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 61 48 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 61 48 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 46166603474319 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -8901435430088 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -101233292512966	72.8% Very good	Read 145 Write 109 Mixed 104 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 936GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 140985192 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 445 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1215699 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 551 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 173 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 68 521535515 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 32 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1259 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 85899345947 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -58205396794964 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2504691554 (F2) Unknown 100 253 26508766088	86.5% Excellent	Read 139 Write 161 Mixed 141 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.64 200% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 110%
Seagate USB 500GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 29GB free Firmware: 050B Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 65.8 Mixed 69.3 51% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.44 96% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 15GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 179 5916 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13325 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 36 36 47169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6534 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 906 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 4 4 589958 (C2) HDA temperature 123 107 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42% Average	Read 78 Write 68.1 Mixed 51.3 49% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 9,254 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3333 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz Performing below potential (97^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	124% Outstanding	MC Read 48.6 MC Write 45.4 MC Mixed 42.4 130% 45.5 GB/s	SC Read 27.4 SC Write 44.9 SC Mixed 34.5 102% 35.6 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)