Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '17 at 20:07
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 179 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 354 44% 335 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 68.7 Parallax 60.6 57% 66.4 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 66.2 55% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4487 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1783 (B1) Unknown 95 95 54 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 45 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 722 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15266489169
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 312GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 122 122 12897288379 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 642 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 760 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 386 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 788 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 788 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 223339544613 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	88.8% Excellent	Read 159 Write 151 Mixed 141 113% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.22 91% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 207GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 172782160 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1603 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 35706062 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3593 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1377 (B7) Unknown 20 20 80 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 70 51540394344 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 61 48 656080935 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 76 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 9576 (C2) HDA temperature 39 52 85899345959 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 295 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 13215614376754 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13665191042 (F2) Unknown 100 253 706589738525	59.6% Above average	Read 90.1 Write 117 Mixed 86.4 73% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 5.09 4K Mixed 0.64 181% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 112%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 64GB-$47 392 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 21GB free, PID 1a09 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 42.4 Write 8.73 Mixed 11.4 20% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.64 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.009 42% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5474-023.A00LF 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.9% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	458x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	222x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	299x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	172x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	59x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16