Partech EverServ 500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPartech EverServ 500  (all builds)
MotherboardParTech C56
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '17 at 19:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D2550
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 48.3
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 16.1
20% 24.2 Pts
4-Core 23.3
8-Core 25.9
3% 24.6 Pts
64-Core 25.9
2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600
Intel(8086 7270)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1089
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 0.69
Parallax 0.59
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 87.9
Mixed 33.2
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.17
59% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD3SSU2GB1WB-DKG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback