Asrock H55M Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H55M Pro (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '17 at 14:50
Run Duration	395 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3440 6,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 72.8 2-Core 139 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 339 35% 281 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 36D9) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.5% Poor	Lighting 31 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 28.6 25% 30.4 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 29.1 Splatting 29.7 26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 345GB free Firmware: 9300 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 68.5 Write 74.6 Mixed 71.5 54% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.39 89% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 83 187456565 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1746 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 51767272550 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7731 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1796 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4491 (BC) Unknown 100 97 4295033343 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 49 471334940 (C2) HDA temperature 28 51 51539607580 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 22 187456565 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 31 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 1030792163104 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3553947949 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1049678620	50.3% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 78 Mixed 71.9 62% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 0.52 4K Mixed 0.19 40% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 68%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 16GB free Firmware: D005DEM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 87 79259424 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4354 (05) Reallocated sector count 95 95 103 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 75846532 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3939 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1879 (BC) Unknown 100 93 25770197022 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 50 420806681 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 259 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 17509 (C2) HDA temperature 25 50 34359738393 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 53 79259424 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 51114405792232 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12146816 (F2) Unknown 100 253 488223015 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	21.1% Poor	Read 38.9 Write 34.5 Mixed 33.3 27% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.19 49% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 39%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 21.2 Write 4.11 Mixed 7.53 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.19 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 1.22 119% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 12.3 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55M Pro Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M Pro

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	20x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	6x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 465NvidiaBench 13%, 1,390 samples	7x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	4x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	4x

SSD
JAJS600M256C 256GBBench 69%, 1,795 samples	13x
XPG SX900 128GBAdata $103Bench 68%, 6,500 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	26x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	7x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16