Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '17 at 20:16
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 192
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 359
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 60.5
57% 66.5 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 68.7
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 345
Mixed 337
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 23.9
128% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 54.9
96% 194 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
312GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 155
Write 126
Mixed 137
105% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.23
92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
207GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 99.3
Write 117
Mixed 104
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 5.09
4K Mixed 0.57
170% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 112%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 64GB-$47
21GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 150
Write 30.1
Mixed 34.2
67% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.62
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.02
38% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5474-023.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback