Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '17 at 20:08
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-4440-$186
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.4% Good
SC Int 89.8
SC Float 90.3
SC Mixed 87.8
71% 89.3 Pts
QC Int 337
QC Float 318
QC Mixed 335
75% 330 Pts
MC Int 354
MC Float 354
MC Mixed 344
53% 351 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$220
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
67.9% Good
Lighting 210
Reflection 178
Parallax 192
63% 193 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 197
Splatting 156
72% 167 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$140
82GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 492
Write 287
Mixed 160
68% 313 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 23
113% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 28
66% 143 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
312GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 154
Write 139
Mixed 145
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$71
207GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 101
Write 118
Mixed 92.2
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 5.12
4K Mixed 0.64
181% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 103%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 64GB-$48
21GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 145
Write 29.7
Mixed 38.1
68% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.78
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.17
45% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5474-023.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 1,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $428
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $390Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $132
Intel Core i5-7600K $212Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback