Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 25 '17 at 15:23
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 95
2-Core 178
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 444
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 110
Parallax 79.5
88% 99.4 fps
MRender 87.7
Gravity 89.5
Splatting 87.9
72% 88.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7b Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 463
Write 197
Mixed 316
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 13.3
84% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 53.1
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
667GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 114
Mixed 90.9
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.45
123% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
212GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 83.8
Write 82.7
Mixed 74.1
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.34
93% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 72%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
352GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 68.6
Write 63.9
Mixed 46.2
74% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.17
58% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 48%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB
192GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 174
Write 177
Mixed 104
189% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.25
81% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 78%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
177GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 77.4
139% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.22
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 68%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B0 1TB
152GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 90.1
Mixed 90.3
110% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.29
87% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback