Toshiba Satellite Radius L40W-C1959

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba Satellite Radius L40W-C1959 (all builds)
Motherboard	FF40 06A1
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151007
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '17 at 10:15
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 152 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 246 33% 245 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 F811) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.18% Terrible	Lighting 5.27 Reflection 8.04 Parallax 5.72 4% 6.34 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 12.3 7% 7.89 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.18% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256GVNU 256GB 736 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUTA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 814 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 240 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 70 (C2) HDA temperature 62 44 240519479334 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	73.2% Very good	Read 492 Write 438 Mixed 475 104% 468 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 18.4 83% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 83 52% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB 30,280 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15.4 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba Satellite Radius L40W-C1959

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)