MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7522
Motherboard	MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '17 at 08:49
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141 4,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 176 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 566 52% 435 Pts	64-Core 747 46% 747 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% MSI(1462 2990) 2GB CLim: 1358 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Lighting 45.7 Reflection 43.5 Parallax 57 37% 48.7 fps	MRender 58.9 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 41 39% 49.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 118GB free Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 1877 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 434 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4300537928 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 125 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 41 253403070509 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 103080853529 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 426 (EA) Unknown 100 100 673 (F1) Unknown 253 253 556 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4225 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	42.3% Average	Read 267 Write 159 Mixed 187 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 4.41 54% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 5.07 44% 103 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 86%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18043 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5524 (B1) Unknown 82 82 623 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 47 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 10 (EB) Unknown 99 99 677 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28555621183	39.3% Below average	Read 259 Write 153 Mixed 197 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 11.6 48% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 36.6 46% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 63%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 22GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 50 (03) Spinup time 188 175 5600 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10202 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25431 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8799 (BE) vendor-specific 66 36 34 (C2) HDA temperature 116 86 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 197 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 22 (C8) Write error rate 200 188 0	26.1% Poor	Read 51.2 Write 39.3 Mixed 39.4 32% 43.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 35%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 19GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 90 138234565 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9372 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 248251320 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 34700 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7279 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 606142498 (C2) HDA temperature 34 49 51539607586 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 49 24355623 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.9% Below average	Read 53.1 Write 54.4 Mixed 45.2 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.26 64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.6% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	188x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	124x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	116x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	74x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	68x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $244

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16