Biostar X370GTN

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar X370GTN (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '17 at 00:00
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 86.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 234 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 897 81% 680 Pts	64-Core 1,279 79% 1,279 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 115 Parallax 100 92% 109 fps	MRender 98.1 Gravity 102 Splatting 102 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50 9,565 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 676GB free Firmware: P1225C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 32 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 139 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 107 (A3) Unknown 100 100 32 (A4) Unknown 100 100 445 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12398 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5800 (F5) Unknown 100 100 14240	87.3% Excellent	Read 518 Write 423 Mixed 461 104% 467 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 24.2 97% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 71 104% 192 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,990 Write 1,378 Mixed 1,204 337% 1,524 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 51.9 196% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 119 128% 216 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 254%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2240 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 59 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 62 (0A) Spinup retry count 101 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 46 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 40 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 73 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197570265122 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 56 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 542 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	113% Outstanding	Read 205 Write 186 Mixed 170 140% 187 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.35 190% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 9,254 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 37.6 MC Mixed 33.6 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 40.7 SC Mixed 28.6 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370GTN Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Biostar X370GTN

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	15x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	7x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	4x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	4x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	3x
Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GISB 2x8GBGBench 85%, 4,000 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $304

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16