MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7751
Motherboard	MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131009
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '17 at 19:04
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 212 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 424 56% 420 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3609) 2GB CLim: 1321 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 40.2 28% 35.7 fps	MRender 45.2 Gravity 42.1 Splatting 35.2 33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6293 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 967 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 113 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13405649489	109% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 411 Mixed 216 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 46.5 172% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 113 118% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 162GB free Firmware: Z32040RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 2630 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 560 (A5) Unknown 100 100 68751130731 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 187 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 27 313532612659 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 150326214692 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1201 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1935 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1513 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2744 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	63.1% Good	Read 486 Write 162 Mixed 235 64% 295 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 5.74 90% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 0.06 57% 136 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 76%
OCZ AGILITY 64GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 26GB free Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 7 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 24 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 214 12 0 (B8) Unknown 14 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 2 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 156 165 390228 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 235 177 312137 (C8) Write error rate 166 117 10401 (C9) Soft read error rate 34 225 8277 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 8 100 58 (CB) Run out cancel 115 62 51 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 160 134 1 (CE) Flying height 33 0 0 (CF) Spin high current 41 64 1 (D0) Spin buzz 216 63 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 84 0 0 (D2) Unknown 112 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0
Poor: 13% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x8GB 3,774 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	62.4% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 20.6 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 18.4 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) - $250

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	240x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	160x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	41x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	19x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	19x

RAM
CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 53%, 4,052 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $657

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16