Asus P6T WS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T WS PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100924
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '17 at 14:43
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 96.4 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 179 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 412 45% 356 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E115) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	8.55% Terrible	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 7.92 Parallax 6.62 10% 8.72 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 11 7% 7.91 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.55% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3925 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 851 (B1) Unknown 99 99 38 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 56 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15289763104	58.8% Above average	Read 237 Write 232 Mixed 216 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 22.6 109% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 23.1 28% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6933 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 802 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 3888 (0A) Spinup retry count 116 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 728 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 263 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 41 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3506 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197568561192 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 94 94 2619 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 294 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	81.4% Excellent	Read 142 Write 141 Mixed 89 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 2.31 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.28 167% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 52.7 76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T WS PRO Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T WS PRO

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	45x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	33x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	15x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	15x

SSD
GOODRAM 240GBBench 79%, 8,481 samples	8x
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples	8x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	8x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	52x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	35x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16