| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus P7H55-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100408 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 24 '17 at 11:35 |
| Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3440
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
|
68.3%
Good
|
64% 102 Pts
|
35% 282 Pts
|
22% 353 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7870-$203
MSI(1462 2740) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.2%
Very poor
|
18% 22.3 fps
|
22% 26.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27.8%
Poor
|
27% 37.4 MB/s
|
53% 0.4 MB/s
| |
|
|
71.4%
Very good
|
81% 109 MB/s
|
84% 0.95 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
42.7%
Average
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
72% 55.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 446 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 94x |
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 71x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 18x |
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |