| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140407 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 24 '17 at 04:01 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4100-$110
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
|
56.7%
Above average
|
47% 80.4 Pts
|
30% 226 Pts
|
15% 235 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
Gigabyte(1458 22C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.3%
Poor
|
22% 40.5 fps
|
30% 36.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
57.9%
Above average
|
77% 348 MB/s
|
55% 17.8 MB/s
|
40% 69.3 MB/s
|
|
|
68.9%
Good
|
67% 91.3 MB/s
|
90% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.8%
Average
|
46% 16.3 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
45% 88.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |