Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170505
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '17 at 01:33
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 184 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 644 59% 494 Pts	64-Core 804 50% 804 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6251) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 33.3 29% 32.2 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 33.7 Splatting 31.5 27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 380 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 12 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 62 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2658013962	80.9% Excellent	Read 507 Write 399 Mixed 339 92% 415 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 20.1 103% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 59.5 63% 104 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 443GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2266 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 345 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 370 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 29 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 72 68 521601052 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 338 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 13 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	81.9% Excellent	Read 139 Write 147 Mixed 142 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.38 119% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 367GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 100 96 (03) Spinup time 118 100 25790775616 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4016 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 29265 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2020 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 135465021 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 51 388038685 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4387 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4387 (C2) HDA temperature 206 122 210454511645 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.8% Good	Read 113 Write 98.8 Mixed 109 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.31 80% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 108GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 135 4058 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1721 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29687 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 168 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1638 (C2) HDA temperature 112 98 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	58% Above average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 102 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.35 108% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 4,772 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.9% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 27.7 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 20.9 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $97Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $749

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)