Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2103 x 1183 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '17 at 08:36
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 221 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 348 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 70.9 Parallax 55.5 61% 66.9 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 73.5 50% 60.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 31 Parallax 28 27% 30.8 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 34.8 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 176GB free Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2656998 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -18854906422819 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 607 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 342 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2656998 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2656998 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2656998 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5046 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5219 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5219 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6480	57.4% Above average	Read 196 Write 174 Mixed 140 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 17.7 112% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 40.4 58% 108 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 67%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5139 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1721 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 86 86 438 (AE) Unknown 100 100 148 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 55 193274380324 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 86 86 14 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 108090894168 (F7) Unknown 100 100 2312235962 (F8) Unknown 100 100 3908195942	86.4% Excellent	Read 519 Write 325 Mixed 390 91% 411 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 20.4 133% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 20.7 58% 115 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 97%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0304 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 30.8 Mixed 32.3 24% 32 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.36 92% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0423 Team-Elite-1600 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0423 Team-Elite-1600 24GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.4 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 17.9 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	375x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	255x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	243x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	191x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	127x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	121x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	91x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	46x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16