Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160513
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '17 at 16:56
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59 6,408 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 124 60% 94.4 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 212 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E348) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 24.4 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 28.8 20% 27.8 fps	MRender 30 Gravity 22.7 Splatting 33.1 24% 28.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7945 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1065 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 57 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 86 86 13238 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5942955815	80.9% Excellent	Read 500 Write 385 Mixed 405 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 19.8 121% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 63.8 DQ Mixed 20 23% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 61GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19787 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2684 (B1) Unknown 90 90 116 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 51 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 4 (EB) Unknown 99 99 155 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28266680639	77.6% Very good	Read 472 Write 328 Mixed 331 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 21.5 117% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 90.5 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 37.5 44% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 130 130 38683607483 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 141 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 687 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 109 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 159 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 159 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 171800264742 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1054	98.5% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 170 Mixed 150 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.22 99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB 2,995 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1TB free Firmware: MZ4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 132 132 21492203785 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1048 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7470 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1015 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1308 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1308 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 180389609502 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.6% Good	Read 116 Write 123 Mixed 119 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.19 84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 85%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41 8,190 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 443GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 86 1 4370 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3812 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27127 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3699 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 9 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 64 154619674652 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 47 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4077	60.3% Good	Read 106 Write 104 Mixed 93.4 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.33 92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 9,885 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.7% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 11.8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	11x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	10x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	10x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	9x
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	4x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 3,851 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $385

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16